亚洲av成人无遮挡网站在线观看,少妇性bbb搡bbb爽爽爽,亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久,兔费看少妇性l交大片免费,无码少妇一区二区三区

  免費注冊 查看新帖 |

Chinaunix

  平臺 論壇 博客 文庫
最近訪問板塊 發(fā)新帖
查看: 1501 | 回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

文件系統(tǒng)的性能測試 [復制鏈接]

論壇徽章:
0
跳轉(zhuǎn)到指定樓層
1 [收藏(0)] [報告]
發(fā)表于 2006-03-28 23:52 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽
For 2.4 kernel
CONCLUSION

For those of you still reading, congrats! The conclusion is obvious by the "Total Time For All Benchmarks Test." The best journaling file system to choose based upon these results would be: JFS, ReiserFS or XFS depending on your needs and what types of files you are dealing with. I was quite surprised how slow ext3 was overall, as many distributions use this file system as their default file system. Overall, one should choose the best file system based upon the properties of the files they are dealing with for the best performance possible!

For 2.6 kernel
Conclusion

With the second round of filesystem benchmarks, I hope everyone is now satisfied with the benchmarks using the 2.6 kernel. What I gleam from these benchmarks is both EXT2 and EXT3 are now roughly the same speeds in the majority of the tests. It also appears the XFS has improved in the majority of the tests. ReiserFSv3 has slowed in many of the tests with ReiserFSv4 being the slowest in most of the tests. It is important to note that JFS has improved in some of the tests. Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem performance and scalability.
您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 注冊

本版積分規(guī)則 發(fā)表回復

  

北京盛拓優(yōu)訊信息技術(shù)有限公司. 版權(quán)所有 京ICP備16024965號-6 北京市公安局海淀分局網(wǎng)監(jiān)中心備案編號:11010802020122 niuxiaotong@pcpop.com 17352615567
未成年舉報專區(qū)
中國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)協(xié)會會員  聯(lián)系我們:huangweiwei@itpub.net
感謝所有關(guān)心和支持過ChinaUnix的朋友們 轉(zhuǎn)載本站內(nèi)容請注明原作者名及出處

清除 Cookies - ChinaUnix - Archiver - WAP - TOP